Home » General

Christian Thought of The Day

26 August 2008 One Comment

This question came into my mind today after reading this great blog post last night and thinking about the article today while driving home.

When a revival leader has moral failures, the other revival leaders claim that the moral failure of the revival leader does not invalidate the revival. However, when a revival critic is found to be in a moral failure, the revival leaders claim that the moral failure of the revival critic invalidates the criticisms brought forth.

How can this double-standard be so blindly accepted as truth?

Tags: , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , ,

One Comment »

  • Grace Almada said:

    Yeah tell me about it. The ppl who were going on and on and on about Todd Bentley and how awesome he is and how he started the revival and is anointed of God are trying to recant their statements and be like, “We never said it was about Todd Bentely–We were talking about the move of God!”

    Move of God–Yeah right.

    Ya’llz were going on and on and on about Todd Bentely and you KNOW IT. Stop trying to cover your tracks hypocrites.

    Good question–Ppl need to hear the truth and not be so blind about issues being unspoken or swept under the rug. I honestly wish Todd Bentley the best and hope he gets help but guess what? There are gonna be baby Christians thinking, “So this is what God is all about? I can have an affair on my wife and preach at the same time??” [Believe me ppl think that....]

    Double standards are pure hypocrisy itself. Period.

    -Grace